The UK’s prison system is under mounting pressure, sparking political debate about the role of non-custodial sentences in reducing reoffending. Drawing on evidence from international practices, this briefing explores the potential of community sentencing to reduce recidivism rates, improve rehabilitation outcomes, and address prison overcrowding.
- Longer prison sentences are increasingly common, with ‘sentencing inflation’ contributing to overcrowding and poor conditions in prisons.
- In response to this growing pressure, the government has launched an Independent Sentencing Review to examine both custodial and community-based sentencing options.
- Community sentencing, where offenders are punished without imprisonment, is promoted by campaigners as an alternative to short prison terms.
- Examples of community sentencing include fines, home detention, community service, restorative justice, and treatment programmes.
- Imprisonment is expensive, costing £37,500 per person annually, compared to £2,500–£4,000 for a community order.
- Evidence from other countries suggests community sentences can reduce reoffending and improve rehabilitation outcomes.
- In the Netherlands, community sentencing reallocates resources toward rehabilitation, with changes in the justice system contributing to a reduced prison population.
- Norway’s exemplar model prioritises rehabilitation through community sanctions, such as electronic monitoring and limited custodial sentences for young offenders. It has one of the world’s lowest recidivism rates.
- Other countries, such as Canada, Australia, Northern Ireland, and New Zealand use community sentencing with positive results.
- The government should consider increasing the use of community sentencing, with international evidence showing there is potential for alleviating pressure on the justice system.
DOWNLOAD THE BRIEFING: PDF